我们中国文化,博大精深,有上下五千多年的悠久历史,中国文化不但对日本、朝鲜半岛产生过重要影响,还对越南、新加坡等东南亚、南亚国家乃至美洲地区产生了深远的影响。但近日却有韩国网友在国外知乎上提出了“凭什么中国人主张韩日越三国文化起源于中国?”的问题,此问题一出,得到了世界各国网友的积极回答,方式五花八门,咱们看看他们都是怎么回答的。
美国俄亥俄大学历史与拉丁语硕士亚历克斯·曼的回答如下:
For what? This is not spoken, but evidence, evidence, evidence.
So far, Vietnam, South Korea and other countries have been unable to produce specific evidence to prove their claims, or the so-called evidence that cannot be confirmed.
Give a few simple examples.
1. Among Koreans and Vietnamese, some say Chinese characters were invented by Koreans, while others say they were invented by Vietnamese.
Then the problem comes. If Chinese characters were invented by Koreans or Vietnamese, they should have evidence of the evolution of Chinese characters, but they didn't.
In contrast, China has a complete set of archaeological evidence, from the Shang Dynasty oracle bone inscriptions 4000 years ago, to the Zhou Dynasty gold inscriptions more than 3000 years ago, to the large seal script 2500 years ago, the small seal script 2000 years ago, to the later official script, and so on.
On the other hand, Vietnam and South Korea have no archaeological evidence of Chinese characters dating back to 2000 years ago.
Secondly, Vietnamese and Korean, their grammatical structure is so different from that of China for thousands of years that we can't understand a group of people who invented a language completely different from the language they use every day.
More importantly, China has a large number of Chinese books dating back to 2000 years, while South Korea and Vietnam do not have books dating back to 2000 years. The earliest recorded history books, except for some of the latest archaeology, are only a thousand years old.
In other words, 2000 years ago, neither Vietnam nor South Korea had official history books.
2. For example, Koreans insist that Koguryo is Korean, but the earliest history book of Korea, "records of the Three Kingdoms", clearly points out that the founder of Koguryo is a descendant of the Yellow Emperor. This is not a book written by Chinese, but by Korean ancestors.
If Koreans want to deny it now, they must first deny their ancestors' claims.
Similarly, the ancient history of Vietnam also records that Vietnamese are descendants of Yan Emperor.
You know, "Yan Huang" are two leaders in ancient Chinese legends. Yan is Emperor Yan, and Huang is Emperor Huang. Yanhuang is considered to be the ancestor of Chinese civilization, and the Chinese people are called the son of Yanhuang. Yan Emperor Jiang's surname is Shennong, the leader of Yan Emperor's family, and the Yellow Emperor Ji's surname is Gongsun and Xuanyuan.
What I want to say is that China, South Korea or Vietnam can claim that they invented something, but when they put forward this claim, they need to provide convincing historical evidence.
If there is a dispute, exchange evidence with each other.Check the reliability of the evidence.
The evidence can be as follows:
1. According to old books, the closer to the time of the said history, the greater the credibility. For example, the contents of the records in A.D. 1000 are certainly more reliable than those of the books published in A.D. 2000.
2. Look for modern science and technology such as DNA to help study the genetic structure, differentiation and mixing of Han, Japanese and Korean populations.
3. The search for publicly unearthed cultural relics must be completely open, and outsiders cannot be allowed to participate, as in some countries.
I'm telling you about Tanjung on the Korean Peninsula.
The story of tanjun comes from the ancient Korean books "the legacy of the Three Kingdoms" and "imperial rhyme" written in the 13th century. The oldest extant version of this book is the Qingzhou engraving in 1360 (the first Jinzhou engraving, dated 1295-1296, has been lost). Before the Korean Dynasty, there were many legends about tanjun Pang Pang Pang Pang, but they were not recorded.
In March, 1987, Korean historian Jiang Renshu published an article entitled "the formation of tanjun myth" in the Journal of historical research, and then published several papers in the fourth issue of the journal in 1987, the third and fourth issues in 1988, and the first issue in 1990, which gave a new interpretation of tanjun's myth, but in general, they have not broken through the "myth theory".
By September 7th, 1993, Ms. Jiang published a long article in the official newspaper "Korean democracy" and began to abandon the "myth theory", arguing that "tanjun Tanjung Tanjung Tanjung does exist and his grave is in Pyongyang". Later, it was reported that the legendary tanjun tomb was being excavated at this time.
On September 28, 1993, the Korean media reported that the skeleton of tanjun was found in a tomb near Pyongyang ", and" tanjun, which is traditionally considered to be a mythical figure, actually exists ".
According to the report, tanjun's tomb is located in the south slope of DOC mountain in the northwest of Jiangdong County in Pyongyang. A total of 86 bones of a man and a woman were excavated, and some of them were found to be the bones of a 170 cm tall man after merging. They said that according to the new book of Dongguo geography, tanjun was buried here. ", This book was written in 1530.
The interesting part here is too obvious.
Two skeletons were found. Are they tanjun's skeletons? We all know that there was a burial system in ancient times. The higher the status, the more people were buried. How could such a prestigious person be buried with only one person?
The most interesting thing is that they use the so-called electron constant magnetic resonance dating method. According to current technology, the error range of this method is between thousands of years and tens of thousands of years.
Surprisingly, North Korean scientists were able to come up with an accurate figure of 5011.
In fact, there is a more accurate radioactive carbon method, which can be accurate to about 100 years. Why not use it in North Korea?
The report also said that in addition to the excavation of two human bones, there was also a gold bronze crown with vertical plates on the front, fragments with rings, a gold bronze chain, several pieces of iron coffin nails and many pieces of grey pottery.
Seeing here, people who understand history or archaeology understand that the coffin is fixed with iron nails. This custom only exists in East Asia, but not in other parts of the world. Moreover, this custom began in China in the Eastern Han Dynasty, and was of tenon and tenon structure before that.
This is true of all ancient tombs unearthed, including those in Northeast China and the Korean Peninsula, that is, before the Eastern Han Dynasty, there were no coffin nails. Nails were not used until after the Eastern Han Dynasty.
Speaking of this, everyone should understand it.
页面更新:2024-04-24
本站资料均由网友自行发布提供,仅用于学习交流。如有版权问题,请与我联系,QQ:4156828
© CopyRight 2020-2024 All Rights Reserved. Powered By 71396.com 闽ICP备11008920号-4
闽公网安备35020302034903号